66
avad I dɔidw sonevetng aḍT .Intoq sit ton at tært duk
.TO/BI
Jært at ynolod edt of emao darit I sonła nere bøjstetter braØN
sdt gairub emit arsqa a'embut, szelvi odt satiktu od taqvo I
,ob nadto vadt awond flow at di as ,tto og aessɔ aid ti‚xoow
Lade I Holdw „ytIvolttib mist of .batsqloltas nsdë reÌITSO
noltasaqua a'd‡im2 . Tetsi mtaiqze of wovasbus brs of teteT
tud,wond [Is aw Jarîw to Jnemetsta a vínnem et di .rswana on ai
mort nabbid sia ajoat suit and dent yaw a doun ni brawrot duq
.bauamtbbs at 31 modw oð batm val odd
edit" tant bataannua evari of amosa ditima TH
*
..
eft vɗ neist ed bivore votqımıánaf nt anolisalnaxe olduq
to moltent telɗo sdt bæe,187telya? vtuqed rolne2 to 1sitatgef
.* .**k noqu rabro aid exam bra troqar sit evləoat sgbul enzluq
yətqurdnad to adnemofs art wom! Jon asob ỵltnsraqqs ríðisë
sandt terit som:troqui taomtu aɗt to al #1 .moltentalni ba
art azoted betsubnos ad blwoda molod aids at anoltanimaxa
--#MOE (#Todt bra nedt shart ed of evad netto arabro rot,●gbut
no vlanitas basqah doldw Totdeb and to Jaetta edit tot semid-
*
Tobru rotvaded aid to embub ent yď bevisser anolaserqnt ad?
anlob tia of avari I BA‚Xчow awothet taomi arið at $I „rottantmaxe
tud ja to him toŋ vigat!Itw blwow I bra redeti tuď gniston
TO leem ti ob blwona I tedd el ti jastroqni word word I tarið
•Show vat prasƐ gnidad at ed nedfw ogbul onelu¶ sdt eawoo to
10.
Your Excellency says (paragraph 7) that
"experience in the past seems to show that neither illness of
one of the Judges, nor exceptionally heavy cases lasting from
16 to 18 days have produced a deadlock". I do not know whether
the illness of a Judge has raised any serious questions in the
past, and judging by the Tables of work for 1904, it could have
made no difference to the work of the Court. But it stands to
reason, I submit, that if the Chief Justice falls ill the cases
he had fixed for trial must be postponed, or else the Puisne
Judge must take them, and upset his own arrangements. But the
more important part of the sentence is the one based on Mr.
Smith's statement about the length of exceptionally heavy casos
and their effect. Your Excellency doubtless imagines that these
heavy cases were of frequent occurrence, or Mr. Smith would not
have laid stress upon them. There has during many years only
been one case lasting 18 days. There seems to have been one
lasting 10 days before I came, and there has been one I think
since; so that this statement of Mr. Smith is couched in such a
form as to be misleading as to the facts. But it is also mis-
-leading in the inference which is drawn from it. A long case
produces no deadlock because its probable length is known and
estimated for beforehand. It produces delay in bringing on other
cases for trial, but not a deadlock. It is necessary therefore
to
it's
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.